Group fills into trades on the Transactions page
submitted
C
Comparative Mandrill
Users Feature Request:
- Grouping Fill Transactions by Order in Transaction Page
- This feature request is focused on enhancing the user experience by providing a more organized view of fill transactions on the transactions page. Currently, large trades executed on exchanges that are filled with many smaller transactions are listed individually, making it difficult to parse and track. Implementing a grouping mechanism by order would streamline this process, allowing users to easily see the collective outcome of a single large trade.
As a user, what can I do?
You can upvote this feedback post to indicate you would like this feature added! The post status will be changed to
Complete
should we pursue this feature. Up-voters will be notified of the status change.I need additional assistance, who can I contact?
For further assistance, please contact our support team directly.
Thank you for your feedback and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience!
Keywords: Fill Transactions, Grouping, Order, Trade
Log In
K
Keppel green Zebra
This feature is critical for active traders. Right now, a single limit order that fills in dozens or hundreds of partial fills counts as the same number of transactions. This not only inflates transaction counts (pushing users into higher-priced tiers unnecessarily) but also clutters the Transactions page, making it much harder to reconcile gains/losses and track performance.
Grouping fills into a single trade would:
Improve accuracy in understanding the true trade activity.
Simplify portfolio tracking by showing the net result of one trade, not hundreds of micro-fills.
Prevent unnecessary plan upgrades where transaction counts are artificially inflated, making pricing feel more fair.
Other tax platforms already handle grouping in some form, and it would be a huge win for CoinTracker to roll this out. It directly addresses both usability and cost concerns for power users.
Sarah T. - CoinTracker
submitted
Sarah R - CoinTracker
closed
Hello!
This post is being closed automatically because it has not received any upvotes or activity in the past 6 months, and we cannot find any related posts.
This auto-closing is not permanent. If you would like to submit the post again then please submit an updated post on our New Posts board. Our support team will review the post and categorize it.
If you would like to connect with our the CoinTracker support team directly, please reach out!
Thank you,
CoinTracker Support
Z
Zaffre blue Canidae
Merged in a post:
Various transactions created for a singular fill order on CEXs (Kucoin); Add ability to combine duplicate orders to classify them as one?
N
Natural Duck
When placing an order on a centralized exchanged (does not occur for on-chain transactions) I noticed that each order I place that gets filled at a market price (on Kucoin in my situation) creates various transactions on my tax reporting statement breaking up the transaction into small increments. Ex: I buy $100 worth of ETH on Kucoin as a spot trade at market price. My tax form doesn't reflect it as a singular order, but shows it as different orders in small increments that equate to the $100 purchase (likely due to the order being filled at different prices as the market fluctuates). It might show; 5 Usdt ETH trade, 20 Usdt ETH trade, 25 usdt eth trade, 30 usdt ETH trade, 5 usdt eth trade, 15 usdt eth trade; eventually equaiting to the total order, but causing me to have to pay for more expensive plans to cover these orders that may cause me to go over the transaction limit for a certain plan, report more transactions than necessary since the 1 order I placed resulted in 6 different orders on the order book in cointracker, and an innacurate outlook of my transactions history. If this could be addressed it would be greatly appreciated, tried to give the best description I could, hopefully this helps some out, I placed a suggestion to address the issue in the title of the post. I also wanted to add that fiat purchases into CEXs (in order to get funds on the exchange, likely purchasing directly into a stablecoin like usdt, which is what has occurred in my case) may not be completely accurate and may be the result of missing cost basis amounts for usdt and other stablecoins when traded on exchanges.
Z
Zaffre blue Canidae
submitted
Sarah T. - CoinTracker
Merged in a post:
Merge redundant micro transactions
A
Average Dragon
CoinTracker tends to interpret Coinbase transactions that should be 1 transaction into multiple micro-transactions (up to 15 micro transactions in some cases). This is a headache to deal with as it simply creates redundant clutter when there shouldn't be. This also artificially increases the number of transactions by unbelievable mulitples. Can you please fix this so that it correctly logs a single transaction as 1 transaction and not 15 mini transactions? I know this is possible as CoinTracker is the only wallet tracking service that does this - every other service I've tried does not make this mistake.
N
Nuclear Llama
Good
I
Important Nightingale
Merged in a post:
Merge Transactions
A
Absinthe green Lemur
Some exchanges report a single transaction as up to 20 different transactions. This is a problem when trying to review transactions.
I
Important Nightingale
Merged in a post:
Split Fills: Multiple Transactions
J
Jade Horse
I bought $50 worth of GOVI on Kucoin, and ended up with 26 new transactions with identical time stamps in Cointracker as a result, I presume, of split fills. This has happened on other trades as well when buying or selling thinly traded tokens. Seems like Cointracker should recognize these as all one trade, given the identical time stamps.
I
Important Nightingale
Merged in a post:
Amazing Organizing Feature Request
W
Well Mink
Hi, since Binance makes like 3-5 pages of 30-50 mini-trades for every 1 trade we take, I was thinking it would be a great idea to have a "Expand" and "Collapse" feature where can categorize them together.
This would make reviewing the trades a lot easier!
Thank you for reading.
Load More
→