Improve categorization and hiding of dust (small) balances
in progress/beta
Chandan - CoinTracker
Users Feature Request:
- Add the ability to toggle on/off small dust balances.
- Users will see a wallet balance of < $0.01 and depending on the value of the token the asset balance may appear with multiple decimal places
- Given the value of those assets, users would like to hide or assume a value of 0 for those values
As a user, what can I do?
You can upvote this feedback post to indicate you would like this feature added! The post status will be changed to
Complete
should we pursue this feature. Up-voters will be notified of the status change.I need additional assistance, who can I contact?
For further assistance, please contact our support team directly.
Thank you for your feedback and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience!
Keyword: balance, toggle, wallets, wallet page
Log In
Sarah T. - CoinTracker
marked this post as
in progress/beta
It’s here! ✨
You asked for it — we are no longer counting dust transactions toward your transaction count. 🧹
Coming soon:
the ability to hide them on your transactions page. Thanks for helping improve CoinTracker 💙
Sarah T. - CoinTracker
Merged in a post:
Exclude Microtransactions on Solana to Prevent Inflated Transaction Counts
Sarah T. - CoinTracker
Users Feature Request:
- Users are experiencing inflated transaction counts due to small, irrelevant SOL transactions, such as play_flip associated transactions. The request is to have CoinTracker automatically ignore or not count these transactions, similar to how other spam transactions are handled, while ensuring balance accuracy for SOL holdings.
Suggest, also upvoting this feature.
As a user, what can I do?
There is no workaround for this issue currently, and it will need to be addressed by the engineering team. Users are encouraged to upvote this feature request to prioritize its development.
Note: ignoring these transactions with our current ignore transaction feature can eventually result in balance discrepancies
Additional Information
We have information on
feature requests
and what the status means in our help center
. For further assistance or inquiries regarding this feature request, you can contact the support team
.Thank you for your feedback and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience!
Keywords: SOL, microtransactions, transaction count, portfolio noise
Sarah T. - CoinTracker
Merged in a post:
Exclude Microtransactions of XRP to Prevent Inflated Transaction Counts
Emma - CoinTracker
Users Feature Request:
- Users are experiencing inflated transaction counts due to small, irrelevant XRP transactions on the Ripple network.
- The request is for CoinTracker to automatically exclude or deprioritize these microtransactions while ensuring balance accuracy for XRP holdings.
We suggest also upvoting this feature.
As a user, what can I do?
There is currently no workaround for this issue, and it will require development changes. Users are encouraged to upvote this feature request to prioritize its implementation.
Note: Manually ignoring these transactions with the existing ignore transaction feature may cause balance discrepancies over time.
Additional Information
We have details on
feature requests
and their statuses in our help center
. If you need further assistance, you can contact support
.Thank you for your feedback and support in improving CoinTracker!
Keywords: XRP, microtransactions, Ripple, transaction count, dust transactions
M
Monthly Viper
My transaction count should be fairly low as I trade 12-15 times per year, where i do a deposit and initiate a coin purchase. However, over the last 4 years, I have at times held coins with numerous staking rewards entries that push my transactions to the Top Tier level??? Exemples are:
2022 = 97 transactions
2023 = 6238 transactions .... thousands of micro-payments as staking rewards
2024 = 811 transactions .... holding less stakeable coins
2025 = 62 transactions... holding even less stakeable coins
This puts me all over the place in the tiered plans!
H
Honeydew Mouse
I am blasting through my transaction allowance with these additional tiny SOL transaction amounts every time I send/buy/sell on Solana.
Would love to see this actioned so these are ignored so as to not use up transaction allocations, but still keeping balance accuracy.
A
Annual Kiwi
Perhaps automatically marking them as income would also be nice, since it's technically an income, albeit a small one.
Sarah T. - CoinTracker
Merged in a post:
Mark SOL Dusting Transactions as Spam
E
Eggplant Bass
SOL wallets often receive very small amounts of SOL (0.000000001) as spam to either get the user to accidentally send SOL to that address, or advertise url's in the block explorer. Since SOL is a supported token, these transactions can't be marked as spam. Since subscription pricing tiers are based on # of transactions, these are pushing users into higher tiers even though they are spam transactions. Can you autodetect these as spam or allow users to mark them as spam so we aren't penalized on subscription pricing?
L
Lavender Opossum
This is going to be VERY widespread once Jupiter users start doing their taxes for the year.
Sarah T. - CoinTracker
Merged in a post:
Ability to delete failed transactions improperly imported from Solana blockchain
L
Likely Pinniped
Not sure if this is a widespread issue, but a solana wallet imported over 29,000 failed transactions which need to be removed. The best fix would be to remove all of those transactions by a re-import. If that is not possible, then ideally there should be a method to delete the transactions or mark them as spam. Currently, as of 11/10/24, the only options available are change category, edit transaction, edit date, ignore. It takes far too long to try to ignore 29,000 transactions when we are only allowed to ignore 100 at a time.
Z
Zaffre blue Canidae
marked this post as
acknowledged
Load More
→