Feature Requests

Feature Request: Option to Treat Stablecoins as 1:1 with Fiat What is being requested? Add an option that allows users to treat stablecoins (e.g., USDC, USDT, DAI) as equivalent to fiat (e.g., USD) at a 1:1 ratio for reporting purposes. This would apply across transactions, gains/loss calculations, and tax reporting. Why is this needed? Many users and tax professionals prefer to treat stablecoins as fiat due to their intended price stability. Currently, CoinTracker calculates gains/losses on stablecoin movements, which may not reflect user expectations or certain tax interpretations. Providing this option would add flexibility while improving alignment with individual tax strategies. What can users do now? We always aim to use the most conservative, tax-compliant defaults. However, users can manually adjust proceeds or gains based on their preferred tax treatment—if advised by a tax professional. Keywords: stablecoin tax treatment, USDC, USDT, treat as fiat, 1:1 stablecoin reporting

Users Feature Request: Users are experiencing inflated transaction counts due to small, irrelevant SOL transactions, such as play_flip associated transactions. The request is to have CoinTracker automatically ignore or not count these transactions, similar to how other spam transactions are handled, while ensuring balance accuracy for SOL holdings. Suggest, also upvoting this feature . As a user, what can I do? There is no workaround for this issue currently, and it will need to be addressed by the engineering team. Users are encouraged to upvote this feature request to prioritize its development. Note: ignoring these transactions with our current ignore transaction feature can eventually result in balance discrepancies Additional Information We have information on feature requests and what the status means in our help center . For further assistance or inquiries regarding this feature request, you can contact the support team . Thank you for your feedback and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keywords: SOL, microtransactions, transaction count, portfolio noise

Users Feature Request: Users are experiencing inflated transaction counts due to small, irrelevant XRP transactions on the Ripple network. The request is for CoinTracker to automatically exclude or deprioritize these microtransactions while ensuring balance accuracy for XRP holdings. We suggest also upvoting this feature . As a user, what can I do? There is currently no workaround for this issue, and it will require development changes. Users are encouraged to upvote this feature request to prioritize its implementation. Note: Manually ignoring these transactions with the existing ignore transaction feature may cause balance discrepancies over time. Additional Information We have details on feature requests and their statuses in our help center . If you need further assistance, you can contact support . Thank you for your feedback and support in improving CoinTracker! Keywords: XRP, microtransactions, Ripple, transaction count, dust transactions

Users Feature Request: Improve the process for editing the cost basis of an outgoing asset in CoinTracker. Currently, users must navigate through several steps to locate and edit the incoming transaction that sets the cost basis. This process can be cumbersome and unintuitive. A direct method to access and modify the cost basis from the outgoing transaction's details would enhance user experience significantly. As a user, what can I do? To adjust the cost basis for an outgoing asset, follow these steps: Navigate to the Tax Center for the year of the outgoing transaction (for example, for 2023, go to 2023 Tax Center ). Download the Capital Gains CSV from the bottom right of the Tax Center. In the CSV, search for the outgoing transaction. The Received Date column shows the date of the transaction where the cost basis was set. Go to Transactions and filter by the Received Date. There, you can edit the cost basis of the token. You can 🔼 upvote this feedback post to indicate you would like a more streamlined feature added! The post status will be changed to Complete should we pursue this feature. Up-voters will be notified of the status change. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For further assistance, please contact our support team directly . Thank you for your feedback and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keywords: cost basis, capital gains, tax reporting, transaction editing

Users may experience: creating or editing a transaction manually to create a transfer classifies the transfer as trades. Expected behavior: Transactions that have equal incoming and outgoing values should be classified as Transfers and not trades. As a user, what should I do? No action is needed at this time, our team will update this post once a fix is deployed. Users who are seeing capital gains on these transactions categorized as trades can mark the transaction as Non-taxable until these transactions are correctly categorized. Review our guide on editing transactions for full instructions. view larger How can users provide feedback? You can 🔼 upvote this forum post to indicate you are experiencing this behavior. The post status will be changed to Complete once a fix is rolled out to all users. Up-voters will be notified of the status change. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For further assistance, please contact our support team directly . Thank you for your understanding and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keyword: transfer, trade, edit transaction

Users Feature Request: Enhance the custom currency feature in CoinTracker to include the following capabilities: Ability to Add Contract Addresses: This would allow custom currencies to have dynamic pricing by linking directly to their smart contracts. Peg Stablecoin to Fiat: Enable users to peg custom currencies that are stablecoins directly to fiat values for accurate and consistent pricing. Bulk Action for Token Replacement: Allow users to replace all tokens or perform bulk actions of a certain type with a custom currency, simplifying the management of portfolios with unsupported or new tokens. Mark as NFT: This would allow custom currencies to be marked as NFTs for accurate tax treatment. Improved handling across pages: This would allow the cost basis and dollar values to be displayed across various pages. For details on how to add a custom currency currently, visit How do I add a custom currency? As a user, what can I do? You can 🔼 upvote this feedback post to indicate you would like this feature added! The post status will be changed to Complete should we pursue this feature. Up-voters will be notified of the status change. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For further assistance, please contact our support team directly . Thank you for your feedback and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keywords: custom currency, dynamic pricing, stablecoin pegging, token replacement

Users Feature Request: Users are not able to edit transfer transactions CoinTracker automatically transfer matches eligible transfer transactions, users would like to make edits to these transactions. As a user, what can I do? Users can manually create new transactions to represent transfers and ignore transfer transactions if they are inaccurate. Update - We now offer the option to unlink and link transfer transactions . You can upvote this feedback post to indicate you would like this feature added! The post status will be changed to Complete should we pursue this feature. Up-voters will be notified of the status change. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For further assistance, please contact our support team directly. Thank you for your feedback and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keyword: transfers, transfer transaction, edit transaction

Users Feature Request: Implement a bulk editing token feature for correcting token recognition errors in transactions on CoinTracker. When CoinTracker incorrectly identifies a token in a transaction, users currently have to manually edit each transaction to select the correct token. This process can be laborious and inefficient for users with hundreds or thousands of transactions. A bulk editing tool would streamline this correction process, similar to the existing functionality for bulk ignoring transactions. As a user, what can I do? Reach out to customer support to be added to the beta group for testing the feature. You can 🔼 upvote this feedback post to indicate you would like this feature added! The post status will be changed to Complete should we pursue this feature. Up-voters will be notified of the status change. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For further assistance, please contact our support team directly . Thank you for your feedback and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keywords: bulk editing, token correction, transaction management, user efficiency

I imported a CSV of missing Kucoin transactions. But of course the wallet name doesn't correspond to the wallet name created in those Kucoin transactions exported with the Kucoin API. Some of those transactions have coins that are not listed in Cointracker's current Kucoin token list. Could the tokens OXEN and SNX be added to the Kucoin wallet list so I could modify the CSV wallet names to the Kucoin API wallet names? Thanks!

Users Feature Request: Existing duplicates Warn users if they are uploading a CSV with transactions that are already uploaded As a user, what can I do? You can 🔼 upvote this feedback post to indicate you would like this feature added! The post status will be changed to Complete should we pursue this feature. Up-voters will be notified of the status change. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For further assistance, please contact our support team directly . Thank you for your feedback and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keyword: transactions, duplicate, duplicate detection