Log in to your CoinTracker account to give feedback

Bugs

Report
bugs
to our support team to ensure they’re documented and quickly addressed. Use this board to track the status of issues as they progress through our resolution process.
Solana DeFi Transactions Labeled as "Multiple" May Lose Cost Basis Due To Order Of Operations
What is the issue? Some Solana transactions that interact with DeFi protocols like Kamino Finance are categorized in a transaction labeled as "Multiple". In the "multiple" transactions are a group of individual transactions such as trades, add/remove liquidity, staking, etc. However, the order of operations may be miscalculated resulting in a negative balance. Example: "Multiple" transaction that contains a borrow and lending deposit may have the asset show the lending deposit first before the borrow. As a user, what should I do? You can upvote this forum post to indicate you are experiencing this behavior. The post status will be changed to Complete once a fix is rolled out to all users. Up-voters will be notified of the status change. Is there a workaround? As a workaround, users can ignore the "multiple" transactions that are affected by this issue and instead recreate the individual transactions manually. For the outflow (send) transaction, users can create it a second after the inflow (receive) transaction to ensure the order of operations is correct. Example: -"Multiple" transaction containing a borrow and lending deposit. -Recreate the Borrow (inflow) transaction first with the same date and time as the original "multiple transaction. -Recreate the Lending Deposit (outflow) transaction with the same date but the time being a second after the Borrow transaction. Note that when the team addresses the issue, these manual edits could result in duplicate transactions. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For further assistance, please contact our support team directly. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keywords: Solana DeFi, review suggested error, transaction classification, swap issue, liquidity pool, borrow, lending
3
·

confirmed

Unstake transaction values increase Net Deposit and cost basis values
Users may experience: Users report inflated Net Deposit and cost basis values due to unstake (illiquid) transactions Unstake transactions were originally 'Receive' transactions which are included in the Net Deposit and Cost basis portfolio tracking values, CoinTracker is not differentiating between 'Receive' and 'Unstake' (illiquid) transactions. Expected behavior: Net deposits should accurately reflect only the actual cash inflow into the account, excluding any reinvested funds. The platform should provide a clear and accurate representation of a user's investment growth, by applying specific treatment for transaction categories. As a user, what should I do? If you are affected by this issue, it is recommended to keep a separate record of your 'unstake' transactions until the problem is resolved. This will help ensure that your personal financial tracking and any necessary reports remain accurate. How can users provide feedback? You can upvote this forum post if you are experiencing similar issues. The status of the post will be updated to Complete once a solution has been implemented and rolled out to all users. Those who have upvoted will be notified of the update. Your feedback is crucial in helping us identify and prioritize fixes for such issues. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For any further questions or concerns, please reach out to our support team directly . We appreciate your patience and cooperation as we work towards improving your experience with CoinTracker. Keywords: Performance, Net Deposits, Cost basis
3
·

confirmed

Reinvested fiat incorrectly counted as Net deposits
Users may experience: Inaccurate net deposit calculations due to reinvested fiat being included as new deposits. Misleading representation of investment growth, as the inclusion of reinvested fiat in net deposits may inflate the perceived investment inputs. Note: This issue impacts users who reinvest fiat other than USD Expected behavior: Net deposits should accurately reflect only the actual cash inflow into the account, excluding any reinvested funds. The platform should provide a clear and accurate representation of a user's investment growth, excluding reinvested amounts from being counted as new deposits. As a user, what should I do? If you are affected by this issue, it is recommended to keep a separate record of your reinvestments until the problem is resolved. This will help ensure that your personal financial tracking and any necessary reports remain accurate. How can users provide feedback? You can upvote this forum post if you are experiencing similar issues. The status of the post will be updated to Complete once a solution has been implemented and rolled out to all users. Those who have upvoted will be notified of the update. Your feedback is crucial in helping us identify and prioritize fixes for such issues. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For any further questions or concerns, please reach out to our support team directly . We appreciate your patience and cooperation as we work towards improving your experience with CoinTracker. Keywords: Reinvested fiat, Net Deposits
1
·

confirmed

Load More